Common Mistakes to Avoid When Implementing Engineered Fall Protection at Your Facility

 

PAGE

 

By PAGE Editor

When a facility manager decides to address fall hazards, the intention is always right. The goal is to protect the team. However, the path from "we need fall protection" to "we have an effective system" is filled with potential pitfalls. Implementing engineered fall protection is a complex process, and a few common mistakes can undermine the entire system, wasting money, creating a false sense of security, and, in the worst cases, failing when you need it most.

A proper system is a life-saving investment. To ensure your investment pays off, let's look at the five most common and costly mistakes to avoid.

Mistake 1: Ignoring the Hierarchy of Controls

The single biggest mistake is jumping straight to the "last resort" solution. OSHA and safety professionals worldwide adhere to the Hierarchy of Controls. This framework prioritizes the most effective safety measures first.

  1. Elimination: Can the hazard be removed completely? (e.g., moving a maintenance task to ground level).

  2. Substitution: Can a less hazardous process be used?

  3. Engineering Controls: Can you physically isolate people from the hazard? (This is where passive engineered fall protection like guardrails or parapet walls come in).

  4. Administrative Controls: Can you change how people work? (e.g., safety zones, warning lines, special procedures).

  5. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): This is the last line of defense. (e.g., harnesses, lanyards, and anchor points).

Many facilities rush to buy harnesses (PPE) without first considering if they could simply install a guardrail (an engineering control). A guardrail is almost always safer, requires less training, and is "passive," meaning it protects everyone without them needing to do anything. A good engineered fall protection consultant will always start by trying to apply the top-level controls first.

Mistake 2: The "One-Size-Fits-All" Mindset

Facilities are like fingerprints, no two are exactly alike. The maintenance needs of a food processing plant are vastly different from those of a chemical refinery or a data center. A common mistake is seeing a system that worked at another location (or in a catalog) and assuming it will work for yours.

This fails to account for critical, site-specific variables:

  • Unique Obstructions: Are there pipes, HVAC units, or cable trays in the way?

  • Required Mobility: Does the worker need to move along a 100-foot roof edge or just access a single point?

  • Number of Users: Is the system designed for one person, or does it need to support two or more for a team task?

  • Clearance: How much "fall clearance" is available? (A 6-foot lanyard is useless if the worker is only 10 feet off the ground, as they will hit the ground before the fall is arrested).

A custom engineered fall protection solution is designed around your specific tasks and structure, ensuring it's not only compliant but also practical and usable.

Mistake 3: Forgetting About the Rescue Plan

This is a massive, often-overlooked failure. Your fall protection system worked! The worker fell, and the harness caught them. Now what?

A worker suspended in a harness is in immediate danger. Suspension trauma (orthostatic intolerance) can cause blood to pool in the legs, leading to unconsciousness and even death in as little as 10-15 minutes. "Calling 911" is not a rescue plan. The fire department may not arrive in time, nor may they have the equipment or training for a high-angle rescue.

OSHA requires a "prompt rescue" plan. Before any worker uses the system, you must have a documented, practiced, and on-site plan to get them down. This could involve a self-rescue kit, a pre-rigged retrieval system, or an on-site-trained rescue team. An engineered fall protection system is incomplete without a viable, site-specific rescue plan.

Mistake 4: Improper Installation and Lack of Certification

You can have a brilliant design from a structural engineer, but if it's installed by an unqualified team, it's worthless. Welding an anchor point requires a certified welder. Bolting into concrete requires specific torque settings and knowledge of embedment depth. A "handyman" approach is a gamble.

An engineered fall protection system must be installed by a "qualified installer" who is following the engineer's stamped drawings to the letter. Once the installation is complete, the system needs to be certified by the engineer or another "qualified person." This certification is the final link in the chain, verifying that the system as-built matches the design and is ready for service. Skipping this step means you have a non-compliant system, period.

Mistake 5: The "Set It and Forget It" Mindset

Fall protection systems live in the real world. They are exposed to sun, rain, ice, wind, and sometimes harsh industrial chemicals. Bolts can loosen, metal can corrode, and cables can fray.

Assuming your system is safe year after year without inspection is a critical error. OSHA mandates that all fall arrest systems be inspected at least annually (and often more frequently) by a "competent person." 

This inspection isn't just a quick glance. It's a thorough, documented check of every single component, from the harness webbing to the anchor's base plate. This regular maintenance is essential to ensure the engineered fall protection you invested in is still a system you can trust your life with.

HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT FASHION?

COMMENT OR TAKE OUR PAGE READER SURVEY

 

Featured